Instead, you have standard AES 256-bit encryption. While there is support for TCG Opal hardware accelerated encryption in the controller, it is not a supported feature of the BX200. This is plenty, but it would still be nice to see five years, as the BX200 does not target frequent upgraders, and even with the same endurance rating this would still equal almost 40GB/day, which should still be more than enough for basic home use. The end result is that Crucial is able to offer the same endurance rating and warranty as the BX100 despite the move to shorter lifespan NAND: 72 TBW (terabytes written), enough for 65GB/day across the three year warranty. This increases the drive’s tolerance for errors and thus its endurance. Secondly, the new controller features a technology called NANDXtend, which is an advanced set of error correcting algorithms that includes LDPC (low density parity check). Firstly, the BX200 has more overprovisioning than the BX100 (480GB vs 500GB, for example), which means more spare area for replacing bad blocks and keeping write amplification down. The second problem, that of endurance, is handled in two ways. Still, this is a familiar technique and one used also by OCZ and Samsung, for example, and it is appropriate to the value client market as write commands typically come in small, short bursts and will rarely exceed the cache limits. Crucial does not quote these speeds, but we can expect it to be much slower. Crucial Storage Executive can be easily installed from is compatible with Microsoft Windows 7 and newer operating systems and works with the Crucial M500, M550. The write speeds quoted below are those of the cache if a single command or set of commands exceeds the size of the cache without idle time then the controller will be forced to write direct to TLC. It then empties itself into the user accessible TLC during idle periods. All write operations first target this cache, which is 3GB, 6GB and 12GB in the 240GB, 480GB and 960GB drives respectively. one bit per cell) which is much easier and thus faster to write to. Crucial is combatting the first problem in a way that is now familiar, by treating a fixed portion of the NAND as SLC (i.e. This is the primary reason for the low pricing, but TLC does have lower performance (especially with writes) and endurance. TLC NAND can store three bits per cell instead of the two in MLC, making it cheaper to produce.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |